Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
34 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

Synsound
Just thought I would share my completed build. Thanks again!

Give a man a match and he'll be warm for a day.
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

Freppo
Great psycadelic artwork! :)
check out my building blog at www.parasitstudio.se
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

johnk
Hi Fredrik,
I just etched and built one today. it works, but it has a constant high pitch whine in the background that varies in frequency with the sample rate pot. the gate trimmer doesn't gate the whine on mine but rather turns the effect on or off and has to be nearly fully counterclockwise in order for the circuit to work at all. is that how it's supposed to be?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

Freppo
This post was updated on .
Hi John,

That doesn't sound right. For me the trimmer is set about halfway and the whine is only heard faintly when playing, and with the sample rate turned up (fully cw) it should be just clean signal as the oscillator goes above the hearing range.

However, alot of people has been having problem with this circuit. It's super sensitive and require grounded input/output and pot wires. The LM324 is a must aswell. Seems like you might have some other problem though.. :/

I noticed a huge difference between my stripboard build and my dual layer PCB. The stripboard build suffered from bleedthrough from the rectifier gain stage making it sound a bit dirty, but the PCB goes from totally clean (is this thing on?) to very crushed. I'm going to write about it in my blog and put up sound examples.

/ Fredrik

check out my building blog at www.parasitstudio.se
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

Synsound
Interesting. When I tested mine on its own I had the same slightly dirty results. When I put it in the middle of my effects chain, which is quite long, it works perfectly.
Give a man a match and he'll be warm for a day.
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

johnk
In reply to this post by Freppo
Freppo wrote
Hi John,

That doesn't sound right. For me the trimmer is set about halfway and the whine is only heard faintly when playing, and with the sample rate turned up (fully cw) it should be just clean signal as the oscillator goes above the hearing range.

However, alot of people has been having problem with this circuit. It's super sensitive and require grounded input/output and pot wires. The LM324 is a must aswell. Seems like you might have some other problem though.. :/

/ Fredrik
hmmm.I went over my pcb and build a bunch of time so I know that I built it correctly. still has the same problem with the gate  trimmer's position and still whines . it also whines when in bypass unless my instrument's volume is turned down.

I also tried a couple of different brands of LM324N's and they both sound the same.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

Freppo
I have built both the pcb and the vero without any problem. If it still whines in bypass it means that there is something wrong around the gainstage/envelope follower. Have you tried a buffer in front to see if it helps?

You can buy the dual layer PCB from me if you want a safe and noise free build.. ;)

Synsound wrote
When I put it in the middle of my effects chain, which is quite long, it works perfectly.
That's interesting. Thanks for letting me know your findings! The circuit would probably benefit from having the envelope follower gainstage after input buffer. I'll probably make a MKII with a few small changes when I have sold out my PCB. The problem seems to only happen to the vero so..

cheers / Fredrik
check out my building blog at www.parasitstudio.se
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

M. Spencer
I was having issues with my build where the board was passing effected signal, but the dry to wet signal ratio was too high. When you turned the pots you could hear the faint oscillator change pitch, but if wasn't sonically reducing like in the demo video.

After all the usual debugging it still wasn't firing right. I traced it to the 2n5457. I swapped in two others but got the same results. Then I remembered some folks using a j201...and bingo, the effect works great. (And I love the sound!)


So...did I just grab 5457s that had undesirable hFe? Why did the 201 do the trick?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

Silver Blues
Not sure but I'd like to point out that hFE is not a concept that is applicable to field effect transistors, because it refers to current gain and FETs are voltage controlled devices.
Through all the worry and pain we move on
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

johnk
In reply to this post by Synsound
after spending some time away from it, I finally got mine working. my PCB had an open trace where the 10u cap connects to the 100R and 2K2 resistor.
it works perfect now.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

Freppo
In reply to this post by M. Spencer
M. Spencer wrote
Why did the 201 do the trick?
That's a good question. As Silver Blues wrote, hfe can't be the issure here. In this circuit the transistor is only used as a switch and pretty much any JFET will work. I guess you either had a faulty 2N5457 or one with a different pinout. I have noticed that both 2N5457 and J201 can have different pinout depending on manufacturer. Very confusing.
check out my building blog at www.parasitstudio.se
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

Freppo
In reply to this post by johnk
johnk wrote
after spending some time away from it, I finally got mine working. my PCB had an open trace where the 10u cap connects to the 100R and 2K2 resistor.
it works perfect now.
I'm glad to hear you got it working :)
check out my building blog at www.parasitstudio.se
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

M. Spencer
In reply to this post by Silver Blues
"FETs are voltage controlled devices."

Noted. Thank you for the correction.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Sonic Reducer - my take on the analog bitcrusher

johnk
In reply to this post by Freppo
Freppo wrote
I'm glad to hear you got it working :)
although mine works, it doesn't seem to have the same range as yours. I only get the more drastic bit crushing when both pots are counterclockwise.
12